
Home | Stanford Law Review
Feb 19, 2025 · Tens of thousands of students in K-12 schools suffer sexual harassment each year. While presidential administrations and Congress have proposed reforms to Title IX to tackle this problem, the potential of Section 1983 Equal Protection Clause claims to protect students from and remedy their sexual harassment has gone overlooked.
Stanford Law Review Online
May 14, 2024 · The statute governing obstruction of an official proceeding—one of the charges brought against January 6 defendants and then-President Trump—faces a moment of reckoning. This Essay by Stanford J.D. candidate Jennifer L. Portis identifies a novel interpretation: § 1512(c)(2) reaches only direct ...
About the - Stanford Law Review
The Stanford Law Review was organized in 1948.Warren Christopher, the Law Review’s first President, opened Volume 1 with a description of the Law Review’s aims:. A dual goal is set for the Review: to publish a journal of worth to lawyers and to provide an educational experience of value to students.Fortunately, these goals are complementary. ...
Alternative Action After SFFA | Stanford Law Review
Prof. Kim Forde-Mazrui of the University of Virginia responds to Sonja Starr’s print Article, The Magnet School Wars and the Future of Colorblindnes
Against the Article II Theory of Standing | Stanford Law Review
While standing doctrine has traditionally been rooted in Article III’s Case or Controversy requirement, there is growing support for the view that limits on plaintiffs’ standing stem instead from the President’s Article II duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
Did Liberal Justices Invent the Standing Doctrine?
While the standing doctrine is one of the most widely theorized and criticized doctrines in U.S. law, its origins remain controversial. One revisionist view argues that New Deal progressive Justices purposely invented the standing doctrine to …
The Right to Vote - Stanford Law Review
Apr 29, 2022 · An election undoubtedly requires some rules to ensure that it is ‘free and fair,’ but at what point do these rules diminish the equal opportunity
An Overlooked Consequence - Stanford Law Review
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shinn v.Ramirez, 142 S. Ct. 1718 (2022), diminished the role of federal courts in protecting defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel by limiting when a defendant can raise an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel (IAC) claim in federal court.Defendants in states like Arizona and Texas—which bar …
Essay Archives - Stanford Law Review
Now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v.Wade and Planned Parenthood v.Casey, the movement for abortion rights and access finds itself in uncharted territory, and the stakes could not be higher.For abortion rights defenders, this new, post-Roe playing field means adapting their strategy and mindset to confront a new environment without a …
Questioning Sincerity - Stanford Law Review
Nov 7, 2014 · Introduction. In Burwell v.Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the Supreme Court extended the protections of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) to Hobby Lobby, Mardel, and Conestoga Wood Specialties, three closely held corporations, and held that the contraception mandate of the Affordable Care Act substantially burdened their religious exercise. 1 Open this footnote Close this footnote 1 134 ...
- Some results have been removed