Forty years ago, the Supreme Court ruled 6-0, with three justices recused, that judges should play a limited, deferential role when evaluating the actions of agency experts in a case brought by ...
The 5th Circuit ruled that the agency violated the Administrative Procedure Act when it rejected applications from ...
The Supreme Court is taking up an e-cigarette case. The high court agreed Tuesday to weigh Food and Drug Administration ...
Judge dismisses lawsuit over federal law on marijuana ...
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to weigh whether or ... Arguments are expected to take place in the court’s next term, which begins in October. According to the government’s petition ...
Here's one thing we can state with virtual certainty: The United States Supreme Court has taken a chainsaw to the most consequential criminal case against Donald Trump. It has delayed, damaged ...
The court’s handling of the issue already has provoked criticism, including questions about whether it was necessary to take up ... Supreme Court has acted far more speedily in other epic cases ...
Join The federal January 6th case brought by Smith, which produced the dispute before the Supreme Court ... s alleged taking of classified documents from the White House and obstructing the FBI’s ...
Read more about the case here. And that’s not the only Supreme Court story to make the newsletter this week. On Monday, the justices announced they will take up a case surrounding whether ...
Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House press secretary, called the Supreme Court’s ruling “another deeply troubling decision that takes our ... agency decides which e-cigarettes are authorized ...
Forty years ago, the Supreme Court ruled 6-0, with three justices recused, that judges should play a limited, deferential role when evaluating the actions of agency experts in a case brought by ...